Personal branding for job seekers and career movers.
Most career advice tells you to apply harder. At a senior level the faster route is the opposite: stop applying, start being approached. The roles you actually want rarely make it to the public ad, and strong CVs are the price of entry, not the differentiator.
Hiring decisions begin online, before the interview, before the CV.
By the time a hiring manager, recruiter or board chair has booked the call, they’ve already made several quiet decisions about you. Most of them happened on Google.
Search has compressed the discovery phase of hiring into a single pane: name, profile, posts, mentions, photos. Decision-makers run that search before the first conversation, between the first and second interview, and again before the offer. What they find, or don’t find, informs every subsequent step. The CV is the formality. The footprint is the case.
That means “more hireable” is not a CV-formatting question. It’s a question about the public record of your career: whether it exists, whether it reads cleanly, whether it confirms the level you’re competing at, and whether it gives a reason to choose you over someone with a similar résumé.
Five things a serious decision-maker looks for in the first ninety seconds.
Not your job title: the four lines below it. Does the headline frame your value, or just describe your role? Does the About paragraph read like a real person, or a job description?
Recent posts, articles, interviews. Anything that proves you have an opinion in your field beyond “passionate about the work.” The market rewards people with a position, not just a job.
Press, podcasts, conferences, citations. One credible mention from a publication or platform someone else trusts is worth ten claims you make about yourself.
What ranks for your full name? Is it your professional content, or stale conference photos and a defunct blog from 2014? The first ten results are your shop window.
A way for someone to reach you that doesn’t require five clicks and a guess. Personal site or curated link in bio, not just a company-controlled email.
The three-step framework: profile, proof, presence.
There’s a sequence that compounds. Skipping a step is what makes most people’s personal-brand efforts feel disjointed.
Profile first. The page someone lands on when they research you should already do most of the persuading: clear positioning, an opinion, recent evidence of work, and a credible bio. If the LinkedIn profile, personal site, and Google result are in shape, half the work of being “more hireable” is done before you publish anything else.
Proof next. One press placement, one podcast, one well-cited article. Third-party endorsement closes the credibility gap that profile alone can’t. It’s the shortest path from “qualified candidate” to “recognised name in the field.”
Presence last and continuously. A modest, regular cadence of published thinking (an occasional op-ed, the odd article) is enough to signal that you’re a current voice rather than a name from someone’s back catalogue. Hiring managers shortlist active operators.
The CV isn’t the prize. The list is.
Senior roles are filled from a longlist that comes up in three or four conversations between the chair, the search consultant, and the existing board. The CV gets read once you’re on the list. If you’re not, the CV never reaches the table.
Most professionals think their career is moving because the CV is strong, the title’s impressive, and the LinkedIn endorsements are stacked. But search firms are working from a different artefact entirely: a private, sector-by-sector list of candidates they already trust to deliver. That list is updated continuously, on the margin, based on what they’ve read from you, who’s mentioned you, and what your name turns up next to in search.
You’re not being overlooked. You’re not on the artefact they’re looking at.
Two or three articles, op-eds or substantive talks on the issues your sector is currently arguing about. Search firms forward these to chairs as a credibility check. Without them, the conversation about you is generic; with them, you become a specific kind of candidate.
A press placement, a podcast appearance with a credible host, a citation in someone else’s piece. These show the search firm that other people in the field already take you seriously, the most reliable signal they have short of a direct chair recommendation.
A bio written for a board pack. A LinkedIn that leads with governance, sector or thesis, not duties. A personal site that holds the body of work and the contact route. These are the files search firms forward directly to chairs and CEOs.
A handful of considered conversations a year with sitting chairs and search consultants in your sector. Chairs recommend chairs; partners recommend partners. The introductions you generate matter more than the LinkedIn requests you accept.
See also our answer to how do I get a board role? further down this page, the same dynamics applied to NED appointments specifically.
Stop applying. Start being found.
Roles at the top of the market are rarely won by application. They’re won by being on the list before the brief is set.
Executive search firms, board chairs and CEOs build a longlist by asking three questions: who do we already know, who keeps coming up, and who’s written something credible on this. The candidates who show up across all three are the ones the call is offered to. The candidates who applied through the website are the backstop.
The implication is uncomfortable but useful: the work that lands the dream role isn’t the application. It’s everything that happens twelve months earlier. You’re building career capital, not a CV.
A handful of articles or essays that take a position on the field you want to be hired in. These articles are crawled by Google, shared by peers, and forwarded by recruiters who are sourcing.
A podcast, a press placement, a panel. The recognition compounds: each placement makes the next one easier, because publications notice who’s being mentioned elsewhere.
A clean LinkedIn, a personal site that holds the work, a contact route that doesn’t depend on a current employer. Search firms route around obstacles, but only up to a point.
A modest, regular tempo is enough to keep your name surfacing in feeds, search and conversations. Quietness is mistaken for unavailability.
The shortlist problem.
Most candidates make the shortlist because they’ve done the work. The interview problem is that everyone else on the shortlist did too.
Hiring at senior level is rarely decided on competence. Competence is the entry ticket. It’s decided on the panel’s confidence in the person. Confidence is built before the room: by what they’ve read, heard or noticed about you. Without that prior signal, you arrive at the interview a stranger and have to manufacture trust in a single conversation.
The candidates who feel different on the day are usually the ones the panel already half-recognises. Recognition is the unfair advantage, and it’s entirely manufacturable.
Decide what you actually believe about your work. Most candidates lead with what they’ve done; standout candidates lead with what they think. A LinkedIn About paragraph that opens with a position is twice as memorable as one that opens with a title.
One credible byline a quarter, one podcast appearance a year, one article that ranks for a question your peers ask. Three pieces of public thinking can change the texture of how the panel reads your CV.
Every panel member will Google your name. The first ten results should reinforce your case, or at the very least not undermine it. If they currently undermine it, that’s the priority.
When the panel asks around, who do they hear from, and what do they say? You can’t script the answer, but you can shape it, with a few public moments that the right people noticed.
Four pillars, run for you.
We don’t teach you to network with chairs. We run the work that makes search firms and hiring panels put you on the list before you have to.
Press & news: we ghostwrite the thought-leadership pieces and place the third-party coverage that search firms forward as evidence, and that confers authority on your point of view. Social media: our LinkedIn rebuild turns the most-checked profile in your footprint into a position rather than a job description, so it reads as “board-ready” rather than “still operational.” Personal website: we build the search-firm-ready hub that owns your name in search, holds your body of work, and keeps you reachable independently of any employer. Professional profiles: board-grade biographies in three lengths plus the structured profile pages and FAQs search firms route directly to chairs. Where the right placement matters, our media-presence service secures third-party proof in the outlets your peers and prospective employers actually read.
You don’t need all four on day one. Most people start with the social-media rebuild and a first piece of press, then build from there. Over time, the way you’re found begins to change.
How do I get a board role?
NED and board roles are made by quiet recommendation, not application. Search firms and chairs build the longlist by asking who they already know, who keeps coming up, and who’s published something credible on the relevant topic. The work to be on that list happens twelve months before the role exists.
Stop applying. Start being recommended.
Most board roles are filled before they reach a job board. The shortlist is built from names that surface in three conversations: peer chairs, search consultants, and the existing board.
Search firms keep a working list of “board-grade” candidates by sector and discipline. The list is updated continuously based on who’s published, who’s been mentioned by a chair they trust, and who’s visible at the right level. Candidates already on that list are interviewed; everyone else is the backstop.
The interview is the formality. The list is the prize.
How board search firms actually build the list.
Two or three published pieces on the issues your sector’s boards are wrestling with: succession, capital allocation, ESG, regulatory shift, post-merger integration. These are the artefacts a search firm forwards to a chair as a credibility check.
There are perhaps thirty search firms who source the majority of UK and US board appointments. A focused programme of letter, lunch and a quoted piece in their direct line of sight gets you onto the radar. Cold outreach rarely does.
A short biography written for a board pack. A LinkedIn that leads with governance perspective, not operational detail. A personal site or page that holds prior board experience, NED interests, and the published thinking. Search firms send these directly to chairs.
Five conversations with sitting chairs in your sector, conducted thoughtfully over a year, do more than fifty cold approaches. Chairs recommend chairs.
Common questions.
NED and board roles are made by quiet recommendation, not application. Search firms and chairs build the longlist by asking who they already know, who keeps coming up, and who’s published something credible on the relevant topic. The work to be on that list happens twelve months before the role exists.
Hireability today is the sum of what shows up in the first ninety seconds of being researched: a clean LinkedIn profile, a defensible point of view, evidence of work that matters, and a Google result page that confirms the story. Get those four right and the inbound starts moving.
If you’re senior, capable and getting no inbound from search firms, the answer is rarely your CV. It’s that none of the four signals search firms actually use to build their working list are switched on for you: a public point of view, recognisable third-party mentions, a search-firm-ready profile suite, and peer chairs who recommend your name. Each is buildable.
Senior hires are sourced from a shortlist of names that comes up when the brief is being discussed. The strategy isn’t to apply harder. It’s to make sure your name is on that shortlist before anyone sets the brief. Public expertise, a credible profile and a stable footprint do that work for you in the background.
At senior level, every shortlisted CV looks similar. What separates candidates is whether the panel already has a sense of how you think: from a podcast, an article, a comment, a recognised handle. Build that signal deliberately and you stop competing on résumé alone.
The role you actually want is offered, not applied for.
Book a confidential audit of your current footprint and how it would read to the people sourcing the role.
Book a confidential consultation